Ask about mortgage insurance information
In: Mortgage
5 Apr 2010Creative financing in the past two+ years allowed financial institutions to give individuals who wouldn’t normally be approved for a mortgage (because of poor credit history and/or unstable employment record), a subprime mortgage.
Today, 730,000 of these individuals are not paying their mortgage payments and are facing foreclosure. Countless others are struggling and don’t know if they will be able to maintain their payments and keep their homes.
The House approved the “Expanding American Homeownership Act of 2007″ that will give the Federal Housing Administration the authority to assist struggling homeowners in making their mortgage payments. Should the taxpayer be responsible? If the individual doesn’t receive assistance and loses their home, will the government (the taxpayer) have to provide some other form of financial assistance that would, in the long run, be equal to what is spent to help them pay their mortgage?
can you contribute to an ira when on social security disablity,can they go against my ssi to garnish me if i dont pay my car loan,how do i check to see if im already getting food stamps,can you transfer property into a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship if theres a mortgage,can i take out cash value of policy at what age,can banks take home from deceased,aflac and california short term disability,insurance card wife name,can i mortgage a home and then lease it,foreclose on your rental property can they come after your home
This is site about mortgage questions.
17 Responses to Do you support providing government assistance to people who cannot pay their mortgage?
LabRat
April 5th, 2010 at 4:58 am
The question’s deeper then that.
A majority of people are in major debt.
The government is in insane amounts of debt.
The problem needs to be worked on at the source, not just arbitrarily applied.
x2000
April 5th, 2010 at 5:38 am
No, I don’t. I have no sympathy for people that didn’t have the foresight to realize what could happen with a variable rate interest loan.
gigi
April 5th, 2010 at 6:14 am
NO, NO, No. If you can’t afford it don’t buy it! If you buy too big of a house, then sell and get something that you can afford! I hate always having to pay for everyone!!!! I bet if you check out their spending habits, there are plenty of ways to fix the problem. Why should we, the tax payer always have to support everyone? I am getting really sick of paying 40-50 thousand a year in taxes to support the lazy, the over spenders, the welfare families that make it a life style, the people that think the government owes them a living. IF you want the government to give you a living then move to China, or Russia or any other communist country. See how happy you are there. I think all who can work should work. Unless your spouse makes enough and you don’t have to. Then that is fine, but don’t ask for a hand out.
iceman
April 5th, 2010 at 6:42 am
Far out Dudes! i wish i knew this b 4 i became homeless.
shroomigator
April 5th, 2010 at 6:56 am
No way… owning a home is a luxury… I don’t see why some people should be rewarded for making a bad decision by buying a house they could not afford… besides, forclosures will help people who couldn’t afford homes at retail prices to get them at a discount…
jeff s
April 5th, 2010 at 7:00 am
where do you draw the line? once the taxpayer is responsible for assisting with someone else mortgage, whats next?
no, i do not support.
the less government the better.
people need to take responsibility for their own choices & life.
i think a better solution would be for a charity organization to be organized for that, & if a tax payer wants to donate to that cause, then that donation is tax deductable.
that would be a better use of the government.
just plain jim
April 5th, 2010 at 7:33 am
The housing market goes down the sewer, the country goes down the sewer.
It is good sound government policy to keep people in their homes and the housing market healthy.
However, I also believe America needs a major correction in order to compete in the world as our labor costs are too damned high. In order to reduce our labor costs, it is going to affect our housing. The government needs to plan for this so we don’t have a major depression. Which also means we must reign in out of control profits.
That is an ugly reality.
Peace
Jim
.
Starlet
April 5th, 2010 at 7:49 am
Case by case basis.
Too many people are total idiots/greedy:
They buy a house beyond their means.
Then they buy an SUV that costs alot, then put $900.00 of new rims on it.
Jewlry, cell phone, eat out all the time, etc.
These people should NOT get ANT GOV HELP!
The ones that should are the ones that have shone t been careful, struggling just fo the LITTLE they have.
The gov SHOULD bail these rare ones out!
g
April 5th, 2010 at 8:39 am
do I think they should? yes
do I like it? not really…
but we’ve got some HUGE issues here that go beyond just saying “they should have personal responsibility”… you have to look at the effects of your actions
the entire home market (both new and existing) is in danger here if this help isn’t granted… and that’s bad for almost every American…
home prices with fall through the floor with the glut of homes on the market… no one will want to build… then every business that has anything to do with the home market will have to cut back and have layoffs, which will have a domino effect…
also rent prices will go through the roof since these people won’t be able to get a house with their ruined credit… which will hurt the poor people who rent mainly…
what do you do when personal responsibility is bad for America?
Dude
April 5th, 2010 at 8:40 am
Can they wait until I purchase a home that I cannot afford so I can get assistance too?
egyank
April 5th, 2010 at 8:46 am
sure that deserve it coz if they will
they gona be home less
Dr. Dave
April 5th, 2010 at 9:44 am
If the person taking out the mortgage is not smart enough to have a lawyer with him at closing to explain what can happen if he defaults, then he deserves what he gets. The government should ABSOLUTELY NOT bail them out!! If the government wants to get involved at all, they should pass laws which mandate that ALL potential hazards should be thoroughly explained to the purchaser before or at closing. It is most surprising to me that the Republicans, not the Democrats (those lovers of the governmental bail-outs), are the ones considering these measures. (Of course, the people who vote Republican are the same ones who over-bought their houses in the first place. Hmmmm. Maybe there IS an explanation, after all.)
Michael M
April 5th, 2010 at 10:21 am
No. I don’t endorse letting irresponsible people who took on too much debt without thinking the matter through to get off the hook. No one forced them to be idiots.
As for this so-called “crisis”, well it has happened before in the housing market, albeit in different shapes and forms, but always in the end the market absorbed it and keep chugging forward.
And all this fear talk about a subprime meltdown causing the end of the world as we know it is just plain nonsense.
word to the kitty
April 5th, 2010 at 11:02 am
Absolutely not. They were lucky to get the loans, but nonetheless they knew the terms when they closed on the property. The taxpayer should not be responsibile. Period.
John H
April 5th, 2010 at 11:22 am
Absolutely not. Repeat. Absolutely not. I can’t afford to buy a home, myself. I’ll be damend if I am going to tolerate my tax money going to bail out some moron who bought more than he could afford, and didn’t plan for emergencies.
I can’t wait to dig into the congressional voting records on this one!
El Chapulin Colorado
April 5th, 2010 at 11:33 am
No. If people can’t afford a house they shouldn’t buy one then!
katles
April 5th, 2010 at 11:58 am
No, they should have done their research before buying that home.